12/26/2023 0 Comments Buzz aldrin moon secrets![]() Are they still keeping it a secret 50 years later?įor the conspiracy mind it’s not about the official ‘evidence’, it’s about seeing patterns that reinforce a personal world view. We have the testimony from those who worked on the project and who made the journey that are still with us today.That’s an awful lot of wool to pull over people’s eyes. Conspiracy theorists often talk about faking the Moon landing, singular – we travelled to the Moon nine times and landed on it six times.Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) currently in lunar orbit which lets you see with your own eyes the Apollo landing sites.Laser ranger reflectors left on the Moon, which enable scientists to make precise measurements of its distance by firing a laser at them from Earth.Abrasive lunar dust that still covers the spacesuits.382kg of Moon rock brought back and studied by scientists.Moon landing deniers always fail to account for the vast mountain of direct evidence: Credit: NASA/Goddard/Arizona State University Video camera technology (used to relay TV footage back to Earth) was primitive, as were film special effects.īrilliant as Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey was, the scenes on the Moon’s surface are hardly realistic.įilms like Diamonds are Forever which sees Sean Connery as James Bond interrupting a staged Moon faking scene, and Capricorn One about a faked Mars mission have amplified the idea that the Moon landings took place in a film studio.Ī view of the Apollo 16 S-IVB impact site on the lunar surface, as seen by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. What would have been technologically impossible at the time was to fake it in a studio. When President Kennedy made his famous ' we choose to go to the Moon' speech in 1962, the technology to get humans to the Moon and back didn’t exist.Īstronaut Alan Shepard had only made America’s first 15-minute suborbital flight that year.īut in eight years, with the investment of billions of dollars, 400,000 people working for thousands of different companies making rockets, spacesuits, landers, guidance computers and flagpole assemblies made it happen. Kubrick's groundbreaking film has led some to believe he helped NASA fake the Moon landing. Stanley Kubrick on the set of 2001: A Space Odyssey. Only evidence of our brains seeking patterns. There are no smoking guns in the photographs. Sunlight was also reflected off the aluminised Kapton foil on the lunar lander and the white spacesuits, as well as off Earth itself as ‘earthshine’. The lunar surface reflects around 8 per cent of the sunlight that falls on it (albedo), illuminating areas – like Buzz Aldrin coming down the lunar module ladder – that might seem like they should be in shadow. ![]() ![]() Uneven lunar topography can also affect shadow length. Non-parallel shadows can come from a single light source simply because of perspective, and the uneven topography of the Moon’s hills, dips, bumps and lumps. Non-parallel shadows on the lunar surface? Suspicious multiple light sources? Light fill when the astronauts should be in shadow?Įvidence not of a clandestine cover-up, but of the accusers’ lack of photography and lighting knowledge. ![]() Shadows in images of the Moon landings are often studied by conspiracy theorists searching for photographic anomalies. A photo of the Lunar Module captured by Neil Armstrong during Apollo 11.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |